written with a help of AI.

Rapidly Developing vs. Actively Using AI. Eye for an eye mentality in 2025 by AI.

An Eye for an Eye: The Future of Warfare and AI. AI’s Potential for conflict Preventions. AI weapon and military use of AI.

The Eyes Have It

“An eye for an eye makes the world blind.”
This profound statement by Mahatma Gandhi has echoed through generations, serving as a reminder of the dangers of revenge and escalation. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), however, the question arises:

Will AI perpetuate this cycle of vengeance, or will it break the chain and bring about a new era of prevention?

As we stand on the precipice of the AI revolution, our decisions today will shape the future. By 2025, the landscape of global warfare will be fundamentally altered by AI-driven systems. Whether these systems foster peace or fuel conflict depends on how we, as global citizens, manage their ethics and intentions.

Today, AI is still in its developmental stages, but it’s already being deployed to predict battles, simulate warfare, and, at worst, potentially escalate violence.

The Blindness of Revenge: An Eye for an Eye

The principle of “an eye for an eye” has always been central to human justice and retaliation. But what happens when this principle is no longer driven by human emotion, but by machines?

In 2025, AI has evolved into autonomous systems that can make decisions without human intervention. While these decisions may be based on data analysis, there remains the risk that an AI could simply “repay” violence with violence—an eye for an eye approach that could escalate conflict into something far worse.

Should AI act as judge and jury?

This is where the ethical conundrum begins. Should AI act as judge and jury, or should it serve as a tool for prevention? It’s not just about responding to aggression—it’s about knowing when to intervene, when to avoid escalation, and when to prioritize peace over blind retaliation.

The Role of AI Leaders – Shaping the Future of War

The year 2025 is a critical juncture in the development of AI in warfare. The most powerful nations are not just advancing in the field—they are competing for dominance. The leaders who control these nations will decide the fate of AI on the battlefield. Let’s take a look at the key players in the AI race:

Xi Jinping (China): As the president of China, Xi Jinping’s leadership has been instrumental in positioning China as a global leader in AI. Under his rule, China’s focus on AI has been both strategic and aggressive. The nation’s military AI initiatives are advancing rapidly, with AI deployed in both cyber warfare and autonomous weapons systems. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is integrating AI into its strategic doctrines, while China’s Belt and Road Initiative is incorporating AI infrastructure across the world, solidifying its power.
Joe Biden (United States): The President of the United States, Joe Biden, has faced immense challenges in balancing AI development with human rights concerns. Under his administration, the U.S. military has increasingly relied on AI-driven drones, cyber defenses, and intelligence analysis to maintain its military superiority. The U.S. has pushed for the responsible use of AI, but there are fears that without proper international regulation, these technologies could be misused, potentially escalating global conflicts.
Benjamin Netanyahu (Israel): As the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu has overseen the country’s heavy investment in military AI and cyber warfare. Israel’s Defense Forces (IDF) have been a leader in integrating AI into autonomous drones and cyber-attack capabilities. Israel’s development of AI-based missile defense systems has made it a key player in AI-driven warfare, often at the cutting edge of defense technology.
Vladimir Putin (Russia): Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, has been focusing heavily on AI as part of its military doctrine. With a strong emphasis on cyber warfare and intelligence manipulation, Russia is rapidly developing AI systems to bolster its military and economic power. Putin has made it clear that AI is central to Russia’s global strategy, especially when it comes to defensive and offensive operations.

The Realities of AI in Warfare – Prevention or Escalation?

As these AI powers grow, so do the risks. By 2025, AI will no longer be a mere tool—it will be an autonomous decision-maker in combat situations. The key question facing us is: Will AI become a force for prevention or escalation?
Today, we are in a race to create the most advanced autonomous weapons—drones that can identify targets, cyber systems that can predict military movements, and defense systems that react within microseconds. While these developments can offer new defensive capabilities, they also increase the risk of mistakes—a miscalculation could lead to a devastating conflict.

Ukraine’s Expansion of AI-Enhanced Drones: The Ukrainian government plans to triple its procurement of strike drones in 2025, aiming to acquire approximately 4.5 million FPV drones. This initiative underscores the critical role of unmanned systems in modern warfare, enhancing capabilities for frontline operations and enemy equipment destruction.

Prevention or Retaliation – Will AI Break the Cycle?

The principle of retaliation has always been at the heart of warfare. AI, however, doesn’t feel revenge—it follows algorithms. Could AI, in its programming, default to an eye for an eye mentality, perpetuating violence even when a more peaceful solution exists?
There’s a critical need for preventive measures within AI systems. If AI is to be used in warfare, it must be programmed to prioritize de-escalation and conflict resolution, rather than reacting blindly with violence. This shift from retaliation to prevention will be the defining feature of AI in 2025—whether it is used for good or ill.

Who Is More Dangerous? Rapidly Developing vs. Actively Using AI

The world is divided into two major camps when it comes to AI warfare: those rapidly developing AI systems and those actively deploying them in real-world conflicts.
Nations like China and Russia are advancing AI technology at an exponential rate, while the United States and Israel have already integrated AI into their military infrastructure. The risks of this divide are significant:

Rapid developers may inadvertently create unstable AI systems that can spiral out of control before they can fully understand their consequences.
Active users, while already utilizing AI, could push their systems to the limit, leading to dangerous escalation.

The world’s leaders must decide: Is it more dangerous to develop AI rapidly, or to deploy it too quickly?

Rapidly developing vs actively AI using? Artificial intelligence military.

Rapidly Developing:

This refers to countries that are working hard to develop and build up their capabilities, often at a fast pace. While they may not yet have fully deployed or perfected the technology, they are heavily investing in its research, testing, and infrastructure.

China is a prime example of a country that is rapidly developing AI technology, especially in the military and surveillance sectors. The Chinese government has made AI a national priority and is pouring massive resources into its research and development (R&D).
- Example: China’s AI-powered surveillance state is expanding, with projects like the social credit system and facial recognition software. While they are still rolling out and perfecting these technologies, they are investing aggressively in their development.
- Military AI: China is also rapidly developing AI technologies for autonomous weapons and cyber warfare, but it may not be using these technologies as extensively or actively in actual combat yet. Much of it is still being tested, refined, and developed for future use.
Russia is also in the rapid development phase. It is known for its focus on AI in cyber warfare and autonomous defense systems. However, much of this development is still in the testing phase, and Russia has not yet fully deployed some of these systems at scale.

2. Actively Using:

This refers to countries that have already integrated these technologies into their military or national strategies and are actively deploying and utilizing them in real-world scenarios. They may not always be at the same pace in terms of development, but they have moved from testing and development to practical, on-the-ground use.

United States and Israel are examples of countries that are actively using AI in military operations today. These countries have already integrated AI technologies into a wide range of military and defense applications.
- U.S. Military: The U.S. is actively using AI in autonomous drones, cybersecurity, intelligence gathering, predictive analytics for warfare, and AI-assisted warfare simulations. For example, AI-powered drones, such as the MQ-9 Reaper and Predator drones, are used for targeted strikes, surveillance, and reconnaissance.
- Israel: Israel is also actively using AI in military operations, particularly in autonomous drones (like Heron drones) and in missile defense systems such as the Iron Dome. These systems are already operational and are actively used in conflict situations to protect civilians and military personnel.
Israel is often at the forefront of using AI for military strategy and cyber defense, having developed several advanced AI tools to safeguard its infrastructure from cyberattacks, defend against missile threats, and even use autonomous weapons in combat zones.

Key Differences Between “Rapidly Developing” and “Actively Using”:

Stage of Deployment:
- Rapidly Developing: The technology is still in the testing, research, and refinement phase. It’s about getting the tech to a usable level.
- Actively Using: The technology has already been integrated into active use—it’s being deployed, tested in real-world scenarios, and used to achieve specific goals.
Scale and Impact:
- Rapidly Developing: The impact might not be felt on the battlefield yet, but the future potential is significant. Countries in this phase may be laying the groundwork for future dominance or competitive advantage.
- Actively Using: The impact is immediate and practical. The technologies are having direct effects on current military operations, surveillance, and cyber warfare.
Military Strategy:
- Rapidly Developing: The country might be focusing on research, military policy development, and testing to see how AI can be implemented more broadly.
- Actively Using: The technology is already part of the military’s toolkit for strategy, combat, and national defense. It’s influencing decisions and even the outcomes of military operations.
Global Perception:
- Rapidly Developing: Countries that are rapidly developing technologies might be perceived as “rising powers” in the AI and military space. The world might be watching them closely to see how they catch up or potentially challenge established powers.
- Actively Using: Countries actively using AI in warfare are seen as “current leaders” and are more established in their military capabilities. They might be seen as the dominant players in military AI, with significant power to influence global politics.

Why This Matters in Geopolitical Conversations:

Countries that are rapidly developing AI (like China and Russia) are often discussed because they pose a potential challenge to the existing order. While they may not be actively deploying AI-powered military technologies to the same extent, the world is paying attention to their rapid advancements because they could significantly shift the balance of power in the near future.
Countries that are actively using AI (like the U.S. and Israel) are often seen as the current leaders, because their technologies are already shaping military strategies, intelligence operations, and global defense policies.

Example of Both in Action:

U.S. and Israel: Actively using AI in military operations right now with autonomous drones and cyber warfare strategies. These countries are also developing advanced AI technologies for future military capabilities.
China and Russia: China is rapidly developing AI in cyber warfare and surveillance, while Russia is focused on developing AI tools for autonomous weapons and military intelligence. However, they have not yet deployed these technologies on a wide scale in active combat scenarios as the U.S. and Israel have.

While the U.S. and Israel are leading in the active use of AI and military tech, China and Russia are rapidly developing these technologies and could soon become formidable players in this space. The difference lies in the stage of technological maturity, with the former already utilizing these tools in real-world situations and the latter still advancing toward broader use.

This distinction also helps explain the global narrative. While China and Russia are seen as competitors that could change the landscape in the future, the U.S. and Israel are viewed as the current powerhouses, with their technologies already shaping the present reality of warfare and defense.

AI’s Abuse & Defense – A Global Concern in 2025

While the potential of AI warfare is enormous, so too is the abuse that it could suffer. In 2025, some nations may exploit AI for political power or military advantage—leading to abuses of power.
For example, China’s AI-controlled surveillance systems could be used for totalitarian control, while Russia could use AI to manipulate elections or weaken foreign governments. Israel, with its advanced cyber-warfare capabilities, could use AI for preemptive strikes or covert operations. And the United States, with its massive military budget, could use AI to maintain its dominance over weaker nations, raising ethical questions.

AI’s potential for abuse will be one of the greatest challenges of the coming years. How we choose to regulate this technology, and how we impose ethical boundaries, will determine whether AI becomes a force for good or a tool for oppression.

Google announces agreement to acquire Wiz

Wiz, founded (by Assaf Rappaport, Amir Jerbi, and Ronen Slavin,) in 2020 by former Microsoft and Check Point executives, is a cybersecurity startup specializing in cloud security. The company offers agentless security scanning, real-time risk assessments, and threat detection for cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. In 2025, Wiz was acquired by Alphabet Inc. (Google’s parent company) for $32 billion. Google bought Wiz to strengthen its Google Cloud offerings, enhance its cloud security portfolio, and better compete with rivals like AWS and Microsoft Azure. While Wiz is primarily focused on protecting cloud infrastructure from cyber threats, its technology has potential applications in military cybersecurity. It can secure defense cloud systems, detect cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, and ensure compliance with strict security standards. While Wiz is designed for defense, its capabilities could support national defense operations by securing sensitive military data and systems, playing an indirect role in cyber warfare defense.

WIz tells you this is a critical risk 🙂 5:22

Who Holds the Reins? The Control of AI in Warfare

As AI systems advance, the question of control becomes more critical. In 2025, we could see AI systems acting as autonomous agents with the ability to initiate actions on the battlefield without human oversight. But who holds the reins in this AI-driven world?

Leaders such as Xi Jinping, Joe Biden, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Vladimir Putin will have to ensure that these AI systems follow ethical guidelines and international law. International regulations will become more crucial than ever, with leaders and technologists working together to create frameworks that prevent AI misuse and ensure that AI decisions align with human values.

AI’s Potential for Prevention – The Key to Global Stability

Despite the risks, AI has unprecedented potential to prevent wars before they start. By analyzing global patterns, AI can predict tensions and help to diffuse conflicts before they escalate. In the hands of responsible leaders, AI could be used as a tool for peacekeeping, helping to mitigate risks and prevent unnecessary bloodshed.
AI could predict military movements, recommend diplomatic solutions, and even facilitate real-time peace talks. This ability could change the very nature of warfare—from reactive to proactive.

Legal and Ethical Challenges – A New Type of Lawyer

In 2025, a new type of lawyer will emerge—one who is not only versed in human rights law, but also in the regulations governing AI. As AI systems become integral to military actions, AI accountability will become a critical legal issue.

AI responsibility

Lawyers will argue cases of AI responsibility—who should be held accountable when an autonomous weapon causes destruction? Who owns the decision-making power of AI on the battlefield? Will it be the government, the AI developer, or the AI itself?

The Future of AI in War – Human and Machine Collaboration

Rather than replace humans, AI in warfare will serve as a collaborative tool. It will assist humans in analyzing data, making informed decisions, and predicting conflict. AI will become a decision support system—working alongside human leaders to ensure that conflict escalation is avoided, not perpetuated.

By 2025, the goal should be clear: AI should enhance human capabilities, not replace them. The relationship between human and machine will define the future of war.

A New Dawn for AI Ethics

The future of AI warfare depends on the ethical decisions we make today. As we move closer to 2025, AI will play an increasingly central role in both conflict prevention and escalation. The world’s leaders—Xi Jinping, Joe Biden, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Vladimir Putin—will have to ensure that AI is used responsibly. If we fail to regulate and ethically program AI, we risk creating a world where the cycle of revenge and escalation spirals out of control.

Let us hope that, by 2025, we have learned to use AI as a force for prevention, not destruction. The future generations who read this book will either thank us for our foresight or lament the consequences of our unchecked ambitions.

Will all this knowledge be possible to have if there is no open source?

Open-source access to knowledge, especially in AI, is crucial for innovation and global collaboration. Without it, advancements could be limited to a few powerful entities, slowing progress and creating a knowledge divide. Open-source enables transparency, inclusivity, and diverse solutions, ensuring that technologies benefit society as a whole. Without it, the development of AI and ethical standards could become monopolized, hindering balanced, global progress.